"In the right order of things, education—the
early fashioning of character and the formation of conscience—comes before
legislation. Nothing is more determinative of our future than how we teach our
children. If we fail at this, we will sow growing social chaos and inequality
that no law can rectify.
In California’s public schools, there are six
million students, 300,000 teachers—all subject to tens of thousands of laws and
regulations. In addition to the teacher in the classroom, we have a principal
in every school, a superintendent and governing board for each school district.
Then we have the State Superintendent and the State Board of Education, which
makes rules and approves endless waivers—often of laws which you just passed.
Then there is the Congress which passes laws like “No Child Left Behind,” and
finally the Federal Department of Education, whose rules, audits and fines
reach into every classroom in America, where sixty million children study, not
six million.
Add to this the fact that three million
California school age children speak a language at home other than English and
more than two million children live in poverty. And we have a funding system
that is overly complex, bureaucratically driven and deeply inequitable. That is
the state of affairs today.
The laws that are in fashion demand tightly
constrained curricula and reams of accountability data. All the better if it
requires quiz-bits of information, regurgitated at regular intervals and stored
in vast computers. Performance metrics, of course, are invoked like talismans.
Distant authorities crack the whip, demanding quantitative measures and a
stark, single number to encapsulate the precise achievement level of every
child.
We seem to think that education is a
thing—like a vaccine—that can be designed from afar and simply injected into
our children. But as the Irish poet, William Butler Yeats said, “Education is
not the filling of a pail but the lighting of a fire.”
This year, as you consider new education
laws, I ask you to consider the principle of Subsidiarity. Subsidiarity is the
idea that a central authority should only perform those tasks which cannot be
performed at a more immediate or local level. In other words, higher or more
remote levels of government, like the state, should render assistance to local
school districts, but always respect their primary jurisdiction and the dignity
and freedom of teachers and students.
Subsidiarity is offended when distant
authorities prescribe in minute detail what is taught, how it is taught and how
it is to be measured. I would prefer to trust our teachers who are in the
classroom each day, doing the real work – lighting fires in young minds.
My 2013 Budget Summary lays out the case for
cutting categorical programs and putting maximum authority and discretion back
at the local level—with school boards. I am asking you to approve a brand new
Local Control Funding Formula which would distribute supplemental funds — over
an extended period of time — to school districts based on the real world
problems they face. This formula recognizes the fact that a child in a family
making $20,000 a year or speaking a language different from English or living
in a foster home requires more help. Equal treatment for children in unequal
situations is not justice."
Governor Jerry Brown
January 24, 2013
http://gov.ca.gov/home.php
Thank you, Governor Brown.
Janet English
January 24, 2013
http://gov.ca.gov/home.php
Thank you, Governor Brown.
Janet English
Finally someone has said it!
ReplyDelete